Which statement regarding OSHA regulations on cadmium exposure is false?

The statement that monitoring is not required for exposure under the permissible exposure limit (PEL) is misleading because the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations typically necessitate monitoring of worker exposure, particularly when there is a potential for harmful exposure. Even if levels are under the PEL, employers are encouraged to maintain monitoring practices to ensure that exposure does not inadvertently rise above safe limits.

This is particularly relevant for cadmium, as it is a toxic heavy metal and can pose serious health risks even at lower levels of exposure. Biological monitoring and other assessment methods are essential in preventing long-term health effects and ensuring a safer workplace environment. While strict monitoring protocols are emphasized when exposure exceeds the PEL, it is standard practice to have some level of monitoring in place for all employees who might be potentially exposed to harmful substances like cadmium, even at levels deemed acceptable.

The other options reflect appropriate regulatory standards and practices regarding cadmium exposure, highlighting necessary actions and monitoring methods that must be implemented under OSHA guidelines.